Author Bio

Contact

• Bolivia and Chile’s Tunnel Vision

  Posted on June 8th, 2009 Administrator

  Written by Benjamin Dangl

  Source: The Guardian Unlimited

  In the war of the Pacific in 1879, a conflict in part over access to guano for fertilizer, Chile took away Bolivia’s only access to the Pacific Ocean. More than a century later, demands from Bolivia for the recuperation of this land are now louder than ever.

  The most recently proposed solution to the diplomatic crisis seems to be straight out of a science fiction novel: the construction of a 150km tunnel from Bolivia to an artificial island created by the excavated dirt.

  The tunnel, proposed by three Chilean architects, would allow for regular vehicle transport and include a gas duct to export gas (Bolivia is home to extensive natural gas reserves).

  Similar to many Bolivians’ demands for a fully nationalized gas industry and land reform, Bolivia’s call for access to the ocean is bound up in a widespread desire to recuperate looted riches and natural wealth. However, this most recent proposal falls significantly short of the full access due to Bolivia, and seems to be yet another sign that Chile is not taking Bolivia seriously in its demands.

  Tito Hoz de Vila, a Bolivian senator and president of the government’s commission on foreign relations, said the tunnel idea was “a mockery and insult to the intelligence of the Bolivian people“.

  Bolivian President Evo Morales has been a strong advocate for access to the ocean, and in recent years has been in negotiations regarding the issue with Chilean President Michelle Bachelet.

  Mariano Fernández, the Chilean foreign minister, told reporters that he considered the tunnel plan “an avant-garde proposal that will be interesting to hear about. … It’s an important subject for Chile, very important for Bolivia and it’s not easy to find ways to solve all our problems from one day to the next.” Yet this time-consuming and expensive project is far from a solution, and more likely another way to delay action on the part of the Chileans.

  David Choquehuanca, the Bolivian foreign minister, said that he “laughed a bit” when he heard of the proposed tunnel. The minister explained: “What’s important is that even imaginative people are speaking about sea access for Bolivia.” Choquehuanca said he would not comment further on the proposal until it is officially presented by his Chilean counterpart.

  After a meeting between President Bachelet and Fidel Castro in Cuba last February, Castro wrote a column in which he criticized Chile for not respecting Bolivia’s demands for access to the sea. He wrote that the Chilean “oligarchy” has been denying Bolivia its ocean port, and that the land taken over by Chile contains the largest copper reserve in the world, providing the Chilean economy with millions of dollars each year. This is another reason Chile should simply give over the land that is indeed Bolivia’s.

  Humberto Eliash, one of the Chilean architects proposing the tunnel, told the BBC: “Poets say that we must build a bridge between Bolivia and the Pacific that jumps over Chile. We wanted to see if it could work in reality.” But instead of going high above ground, Eliash and his colleagues are looking underground.

  The tunnel would be one of the longest in the world and take approximately a decade to complete. “In the beginning, we thought the idea was a little crazy, but now we think it can really be viable,” Eliash said. “I see this as a possible dream, not madness.”

  But such a plan does appear to verge on madness, especially when he proposes that the impoverished country of Bolivia should cover the tab. Taking a decade to complete would also allow politicians to simply push away responsibility for fully addressing this urgent issue.

  Eliash explained that many diplomatic, trade and migration-related problems are currently being resolved with tunnels in various parts of the world, including the construction of a tunnel between China and Taiwan. The architect also cited the plans to connect Spain to Morocco through a tunnel.

  A major challenge faced by such construction in Bolivia and Chile is financial. The architects suggest that Bolivia fund the costly project, using the profits generated by the sea port to help recover costs.

  According to the proposal, part of the tunnel would pass under Peru, and later resurface in the Pacific in a territory owned by Chile, Bolivia and Peru. These factors could all create political problems with Peru. And recently, Peruvian-Bolivian relations have taken a turn for the worse.

  Peru has made the deplorable decision of offering refuge to ex-ministers under former Bolivian President Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada. The ex-ministers are accused by the Bolivian government of being involved in the 2003 massacre of 67 people in the Gas war, a popular uprising which developed in part due to outrage over a plan to export Bolivian gas to the US through a Chilean – formerly Bolivian – port.

  Morales told reporters that relations with Peru are now at “high risk” after what he said was a “provocation and an open aggression” by Peruvian President Alan Garcia. The trial against Sanchez de Lozada and his cohorts began on 18 May in Bolivia.

  If Chile formally proposes the tunnel option, it is difficult to say what Morales’s response will be. In previous speeches, he has said he will never give up fighting for Bolivia’s access to the sea, and in early March promised that “if we recuperate Bolivia’s access to the sea, I promise I will dance the [traditional] Morenada dance at Carnaval.”

  Yet when Morales made that promise he was talking about full access to the land and ports stolen by Chile in an unfair war over a century ago. He wasn’t talking about an incredibly costly, dangerous, time-consuming and, thanks to relations with Peru, diplomatically impossible tunnel.

  It’s time for the Chilean government to start taking its Andean neighbour seriously in its demands for recuperation of the land and resources that are rightfully Bolivian and stop suggesting proposals that will only worsen diplomatic relations, not help them.

  Bolivia, Chile

   

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Bolivia and Chile’s Tunnel Vision @ Writing by Benjamin Dangl

(Reuters) May 5, 2009

LA PAZ - The Bolivian prosecutor investigating an alleged plot to kill leftist President Evo Morales said a witness had implicated leading opposition figures in the conspiracy.

Last month, police raided a hotel in the opposition stronghold of Santa Cruz, killing three people and arresting two suspected of planning assassinations.

Marcelo Sosa, the prosecutor leading the probe, told reporters on Monday evening a person linked to the group, Ignacio Villa, testified that Santa Cruz businessman Branko Marinkovic and the province’s right-wing governor offered financial aid.

Marinkovic made Villa “an economic offer” and Governor Ruben Costas “offered him a house and land,” said Sosa.

“The aim of both offers was to (encourage) them to finish what they had started, a string of attacks,” said Sosa, adding that Costas, Marinkovic and several other businessmen from Santa Cruz had been summoned to testify.

Neither Costas nor Marinkovic immediately responded to the accusations on Monday.

Morales had already accused right-wing politicians of involvement in the plan, which Costas and others have denied. Costas described the alleged plot as a “show” and the opposition condemned the police action as an “execution.”

Sosa said a second witness declared that Marinkovic, a fierce critic of Morales and a prominent political activist, gave the group $200,000 (135,000 pounds) to buy weapons.

In last month’s raid, police killed the suspected ringleader of the gang, Bolivian Eduardo Rozsa, along with an Irishman and a Romanian. A Bolivian and a Hungarian were arrested.

The Irish and Hungarian governments have questioned Bolivia’s account that the men had plotted to kill Morales and other leading public figures to create a “spiral of violence” that would destabilize the poor Andean nation.

READ MORE

Pope wants Bolivia to explain bombing of cardinal's residence

April 28, 2009

Pope Benedict XVI has asked for an explanation from Bolivian government officials for the April 15 bombing attack on the home of Cardinal Julio Terrazas Sandoval. The Pope's message, conveyed to the Bolivian government by Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, decried violent acts "committed with the sole intention of harming, damaging or intimidating others." Bolivian officials have not yet established responsibility for the bombing-- which took place while the cardinal was away from home, and caused no injuries. Cardinal Terrazas is president to the country's Episcopal conference, which has frequently been at odds with President Evo Morales, and the Bolivian bishops have received threats from government supporters.

Source(s): these links will take you to other sites, in a new window.

• Pope calls on Bolivian officials to shed light on attack on Cardinal Terrazas (CNA)

• Bolivian cardinal's home bombed (CWN, Apr 16)

Quote

Rafael Correa denies Venezuela-Bolivia-Ecuador axis - Daily News - EL UNIVERSAL
Please waitVote Vote ¡Thanks for voting!! Share Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Newsvine Rafael Correa denies Venezuela-Bolivia-Ecuador axisWestern Hemisphere Ecuador's President Rafael Correa, re-elected in the presidential election held last Sunday, disclaimed any axis between Venezuela, Bolivia and his country. At the same time, he proposed the establishment of a Bank of the South to support national currencies. The institution would be financed with funds from the region.In an interview with Spanish newspaper El País, Correa also referred to the initiatives of his government to address the return of many of the Ecuadorian immigrants from Spain, Efe reported.At regional level, President Correa said that his country has excellent relations with all countries. "I have probably traveled more to Brazil than Venezuela. I have traveled many more times to Argentina. If you want to find axes, look and find them.""If there were an axis, Correa said, this would not be wrong. However, I have to reiterate that there is no axis. There is much talk and sometimes people confuse populism with popular (…)" Correa said